linux-kernel - Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <6818156.7441241761835737.JavaMail.james@prod3.pk.lan>
Date:	Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400
From:	Jason Daly <jason2@...marykey.ca>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
CC:	Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k

Thanks for the kernel info.

How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k?  Currently 
the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything 
greater than g.

Thanks
-JD

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org> wrote:
>> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1]
>>> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to
>>> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k:
>>>
>>>  *  >= 2.6.27.22
>>>  *  >= 2.6.28.10
>>>  *  2.6.29
>>>
>>> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29.
>>> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285
>>> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to
>>> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still
>>> in RC series).
>>>
>>> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or
>>> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to
>>> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for
>>> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3].
>>>
>>>  Luis
>>>
>>> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
>>> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download
>>> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable
>>>
>> Thanks for the update.  If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it
>> still best to use wireless-testing?  Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc
>> series net-next or wireless-next?
> 
> Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if
> you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own
> kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save
> buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless
> with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to
> the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to
> backport this (so we just drop them).
> 
>   Luis
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives