[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b637ec0b0905080011g4594917ai786ffe293f9b9a32@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:11:55 +0200
From: Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Matt Price <moptop99@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> On Thu 2009-05-07 20:57:44, Fabio Comolli wrote:
...
>>
>> Well, if I may jump in I suggest you start with the full-memory image
>> functionality. This is in my opinion the biggest advantage in tuxonice
>> vs. uswsusp.
>
> Neither tuxonice nor swsusp can write full-memory image (it is mostly
> impossible to do in unlikely case of all memory is consumed by
> kmalloc). Now, tuxonice can produce bigger images than swsusp...
>
Pavel, please. (u)swsusp can save images up to half the physical
memory IIRC; with toi I used to easily save 980MB of image on a 1GB
laptop. You can't honestly compare the two things.
> Rafael had short patch for similar efect some time ago, but we could
> not find anyone to really review it...
> Pavel
> --
Regards,
Fabio
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists