[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A03F734.2020000@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:11:16 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, bzolnier@...il.com,
petkovbb@...glemail.com, sshtylyov@...mvista.com,
mike.miller@...com, Eric.Moore@....com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
zaitcev@...hat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
paul.clements@...eleye.com, tim@...erelk.net, jeremy@...source.com,
adrian@...en.demon.co.uk, oakad@...oo.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, ballabio_dario@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com, bharrosh@...asas.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len, take#2
Hello,
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> btw, you are still working on the cleanups of the block API, right?
The patchset I sent out today was the last large cleanup patchset I
had waiting. I think I'm now ready to move onto adding new features.
> I also want to see some cleanups of request completion functions a bit
> (e.g. we don't need _bidi_ stuff, we have too many completion
> functions, etc...).
Hmmm... the bidi stuff not being used widely, I didn't pay too much
attention to it. What do you have in mind? Can you elaborate a bit?
We changed the API a lot anyway so if there's more to do doing it now
wouldn't be a bad idea.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists