[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1241778313.4495.0.camel@johannes.local>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 12:25:13 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: lockdep report at resume
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:47 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > > > > [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; really
> > > > > seems like a false positive to me ]
> > > > I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see
> > > > flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch.
> > > I am not entirely sure that this is the same issue as the one from #13136
> > > of kernel.org bugzilla.
> > > Anyway, for reference, the patch Oliver mentioned here is below.
> > Thanks. Unfortunately I have another problem that turns off lockdep so I
> > can't test this right now, sorry.
>
> Are you able to reproduce the problem with current git (the expected fix
> is 89092ddd7a).
I don't know, unfortunately, because I keep getting a different lockdep
report at _suspend_ time.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists