[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090508111703.GG11596@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:17:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] xen mtrr: Add mtrr_ops support for Xen mtrr
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> +/* DOM0 TODO: Need to fill in the remaining mtrr methods to have full
> + * working userland mtrr support. */
> +static struct mtrr_ops xen_mtrr_ops = {
> + .vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN,
> +// .set = xen_set_mtrr,
> +// .get = xen_get_mtrr,
> + .get_free_region = generic_get_free_region,
> +// .validate_add_page = xen_validate_add_page,
> + .have_wrcomb = positive_have_wrcomb,
> + .use_intel_if = 0,
> + .num_var_ranges = xen_num_var_ranges,
> +};
Please dont post patches with ugly TODO items in them.
Also, a more general objection is that /proc/mtrr is a legacy
interface, we dont really want to extend its use. The Xen hypervisor
should get proper PAT support instead ...
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists