linux-kernel - Re: regression in TSC unstable?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090508120740.GB18758@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 8 May 2009 14:07:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: regression in TSC unstable?


* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > The ring-buffer-benchmark module creates a producer and consumer and loops 
> > on do_gettimeofday until it hits about 10 seconds. Then it calculates the 
> > number of events recorded / time running.
> > 
> > After Ingo merged Linus's latest
> 
> merged what into what?
> are you referring to the upstream kernel or something else?

he's describing how he found it: a not-yet-upstream kernel-benchmark 
module showed a performance regression that came in via upstream. 
The regression is upstream too, just harder to notice.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/