[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090508125821.GC15949@localhost>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 20:58:21 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: ftrace: concurrent accesses possible?
Hello,
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 07:47:42PM +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So this should be done in cooperation with instrumentation folks,
> while improving _all_ of Linux instrumentation in general. Or, if
> you dont have the time/interest to work with us on that, it should
> not be done at all. Not having the resources/interest to do
> something properly is not a license to introduce further
> instrumentation crap into Linux.
I have a dummy question on /debug/trace: is it possible to
- use 2+ tracers concurrently?
- run a system script that makes use of a tracer,
without disturbing the sysadmin's tracer activities?
- access 1 tracer concurrently from many threads,
with different filter etc. options?
If not currently, will private mounts be a viable solution?
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists