[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4A046C3F.76EA.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 16:30:39 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen/x86-64: clean up warnings
aboutIST-usingtraps
>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> 08.05.09 17:23 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> else if (addr == (unsigned long)int3)
>>> addr = (unsigned long)xen_int3;
>>> - else
>>> - WARN_ON(val->ist != 0);
>>> + else if (addr == (unsigned long)double_fault ||
>>> + addr == (unsigned long)stack_segment) {
>>>
>>
>> I don't think you want to exclude handling stack faults: Ordinary memory
>> references using rsp or rbp as the base register will cause these instead
>> of general protection faults when the resulting effective address is non-
>> canonical.
>>
>
>So even usermode memory accesses? Ew.
Yes, just try it out - you'll observe them generate SIGBUS instead of SIGSEGV.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists