[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878wl7o12j.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 21:18:44 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Markus Gutschke (ÜÒÐ)
<markus@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
"Markus Gutschke (ÜÒÐ)" <markus@...gle.com> writes:
>
> There are a large number of system calls that "normal" C/C++ code uses
> quite frequently, and that are not security sensitive. A typical
> example would be gettimeofday().
At least on x86-64 gettimeofday() (and time(2)) work inside seccomp because
they're vsyscalls that run in ring 3 only.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists