[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <791493.63197.qm@web50112.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, greg@...ah.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, mchehab@...hat.com,
aris@...hat.com, edt@....ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/21 v3] amd64_edac: EDAC module for AMD64
--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/21 v3] amd64_edac: EDAC module for AMD64
> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <borislav.petkov@....com>, greg@...ah.com, norsk5@...oo.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, mchehab@...hat.com, aris@...hat.com, edt@....ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 3:18 PM
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:38:07 +0200
> > Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Ingo
> Molnar wrote:
> > > > Regarding workflow, the arch/x86 bits look
> good to me now, so you've
> > > > got my Acked-by for that.
> > >
> > > Cool, thanks.
> > >
> > > Does that mean you're going to pick that one
> or...
> > >
> > > > Most of the EDAC patches are hosted in
> > > > -mm, so we could carry them in the x86 tree
> separately as well and
> > > > export it to linux-next so that -mm will
> have it automatically.
> > >
> > > is the bunch going through Andrew as a whole?
> > >
> >
> > I could. But there's negligible overlap with
> other EDAC work so
> > we might as well merge this via IngoTrees or directly
> from your
> > tree.
>
> If Doug and you agrees too then i have no problem (at all)
> with
> Borislav carrying these bits in a separate tree, as long as
> he also
> opens an edac-next branch for linux-next and asks Stephen
> to pull
> it, and keeps it an append-mostly tree that isnt rebased.
>
> [ I still have to do a finegrained review of this lot, a
> quick look
> suggested i'll have a few minor things to note ;) ]
>
> Ingo
>
I agree, if it removes a burden from some
doug t
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists