[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905090143.10980.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 01:43:10 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: nigel@...onice.net
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
On Saturday 09 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 00:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday 08 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Friday 08 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 23:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu 2009-05-07 19:42:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday 07 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
[--snip--]
> > > And the code includes some fundamental differences. I freeze processes
> > > and prepare the whole image before saving anything or doing an atomic
> > > copy whereas you just free memory before doing the atomic copy. You save
> > > everything in one part whereas I save the image in two parts.
> >
> > IMO the differences are not that fundamental. The whole problem boils down
> > to using the same data structures for memory management and I think we can
> > reach an agreement here.
>
> I think we might be able to agree on using the same data structures, but
> I'm not so sure about algorithms - I think you're underestimating the
> differences here.
Well, which algorithms do you have in mind in particular?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists