linux-kernel - Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020905090412kf7622b2s9af8061b782c680e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 9 May 2009 14:12:46 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	nigel@...onice.net
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:44 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> Please proceed to Plan B then.
>>
>> Adding third core code framework to do the same thing is out of question
>> (probably same should have been said about adding second one in the past).

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net> wrote:
> Why? We have plenty of history of having multiple implementations of
> things (slub, slab and slob...).

Yes, so please don't make the same mistake we did. Once you have
multiple implementations in the kernel, it's extremely hard to get rid
of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/