[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090509132711.GD10859@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 15:27:11 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: nigel@...onice.net, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
Hi!
> > And we have different ideas about how things should be done. Userspace
> > vs kernel space. Providing tuning knobs vs not. And so on.
>
> This isn't _that_ important. Actually, I'm not against an entirely in-kernel
> solution, as there are some clear benefits of doing it this way. We only
> need to be careful enough not to break the existing setups.
Would you elaborate?
I would really hate to put progressbar painting into kernel; and if
that's in userspace, we can do compression/encryption there too as
well....
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists