linux-kernel - Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090509135820.GF10859@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Sat, 9 May 2009 15:58:20 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

Hi!

> > Instead of new features I would rather see more effort being put into making
> > the _core_ TuxOnIce (I mean patch #8 here) smaller (8 KLOC is still a lot,
> > just to put things into the right perspective the current in-kernel content
> > of kernel/power/ is 5.5 KLOC) and with more documentation inside the code.
> 
> Yeah, but those 2.5k extra lines get you more reliability and extra
> functionality. They're not fat.

If you know about reliability problems in swsusp, please fix them in
separate patch. Hiding the fixes in 8KLOC patch is not nice.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/