[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090509155742.GA6340@Krystal>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 11:57:42 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
peterz@...radead.org, jiayingz@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com,
roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] convert ftrace syscall tracer to TRACE_EVENT()
* Frank Ch. Eigler (fche@...hat.com) wrote:
> Hi -
>
> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > [...]
> > Firstly, it adds two new tracepoints to every system call. That is
> > unnecessary - we already have the TIF flag based callbacks, and we
> > can use the existing syscall attributes table to get to tracepoints
> > - without slow down (or impacting) the fast path in any way.
> > [...]
>
> However, as the TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE and/or TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE flags are
> tied to a single consumer, it would limit the usefulness of the
> naturally multiple-client tracepoints, if they were made conditional
> on them. Would you be interested in a proper reference-counting API?
>
I've got this in my TIF_KERNEL_TRACE patchset. I think I should post it
as-is for RFC once more.
Mathieu
> - FChE
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists