| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090510213611.GC30393@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:36:11 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: MAINTAINER email address style? On Sun 2009-05-10 22:24:41, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > P: Len Brown now <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> > > > > L: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org > > > > S: Supported > > > > Is there a consensus/majority opinion on this? > > > > Should names and email addresses in MAINTAINERS be integrated? > > Should it stay as-is or be changed to: > > Please leave it alone or it becomes a total PITA to parse. Currently it is PITA to use... which is IMNSHO worse. <> is standard email notation, and I do not think it is in any way hard to parse. Plus... I believe most uses _are_ manual. Parsers can be fixed, humans can not. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists