[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1skjd4x7o.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 17:29:15 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver-core: devtmpfs - driver core maintained /dev tmpfs
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:17, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> sysfs is slow.
>> udev is slow.
>
> Everything is "slow" if you want to boot "fast". It's just numbers,
> and this is more about simplicity and reliability, with just the side
> effect that it's the fastest you can do, when you don't want to lose
> current functionality.
My primary concern is that you are inventing a new mechanism when
the existing mechanism has known issues that could explain the slowdowns.
My secondary concern is we have are adding a new mechanism when
the existing mechanism has some significant known issues, that are
not currently being addressed. Instead the next shiny bobble is
being tackled.
Finally I am stumped how creating a couple hundred device nodes can be
a significant slowdown in booting. It feels like we your patchset
adds a line of code for each device node it intends to create.
>> Let's bloat the kernel to solve that problem?
>
> You want to add namespaces for devices to it?
I think it is a logical conclusion, and it might potentially be needed.
But that is a long ways out.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists