linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: make mapped executable pages the first class citizen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f11576a0905100236u15d45f7fm32d470776659cfec@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 10 May 2009 18:36:19 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
	riel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, elladan@...imo.com, npiggin@...e.de,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: make mapped executable pages the first class 
	citizen

>> How about this?
>> if priority < DEF_PRIORITY-2, aggressive lumpy reclaim in
>> shrink_inactive_list() already
>> reclaim the active page forcely.
>> then, this patch don't change kernel reclaim policy.
>>
>> anyway, user process non-changable preventing "nice my process up
>> hack" seems makes sense to me.
>>
>> test result:
>>
>> echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
>> echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
>> run modified qsbench (use mmap(PROT_EXEC) instead malloc)
>>
>>            active2active vs active2inactive ratio
>> before    5:5
>> after       1:9
>>
>> please don't ask performance number. I haven't reproduce Wu's patch
>> improvemnt ;)
>>
>> Wu, What do you think?
>
> I don't think this is desirable, like Andrew already said, there's tons
> of ways to defeat any of this and we've so far always priorized mappings
> over !mappings. Limiting this to only PROT_EXEC mappings is already less
> than it used to be.

I don't oppose this policy. PROT_EXEC seems good viewpoint.
The problem is PROT_EXEC'ed page isn't gurantee rarely.

if all pages claim "Hey, I'm higher priority page, please don't
reclaim me", end-user get
suck result easily.

before 2.6.27 kernel have similar problems. many mapped page cause bad latency
easily. I don't want reproduce this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/