linux-kernel - Re: [patch 01/13] Driver Core: add nodename callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac3eb2510905100619j2a76409fh775f42e4a745b4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 10 May 2009 15:19:46 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/13] Driver Core: add nodename callbacks

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 14:52, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

>> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
>>  struct device {
>>       struct device           *parent;
>> +     char *(*nodename)(struct device *dev);
>
> Just wondering what this callback is for.  I didn't look really hard, but
> couldn't find it used anywhere.

You are right, that seems like a left-over which did not get used, and
should be removed from the patch.

Thanks a lot for checking,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/