[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511092342.GA23055@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 05:23:43 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kdb@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] RFC ONLY - kdb for kgdb
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> Do you intend to support kdb modules? If yes, in which extent should they be
> adapted?
I think that would be a very low priority. What would be useful is the
hack to load debuginfo into kdb so that it can pretty-print arbitrary
structures. That alone would replace about 90% of the kdb modules I
think.
And yes, that code in current kdb is even more ugly than core kdb, so
it would need a major cleanup first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists