linux-kernel - [tip:x86/mm] x86: Allow 1MB of slack between the e820 map and SRAT, not 4GB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-0964b0562bb9c93194e852b47bab2397b9e11c18@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2009 09:54:15 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mel@....ul.ie,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/mm] x86: Allow 1MB of slack between the e820 map and SRAT, not 4GB

Commit-ID:  0964b0562bb9c93194e852b47bab2397b9e11c18
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0964b0562bb9c93194e852b47bab2397b9e11c18
Author:     Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:37:34 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:38:21 +0200

x86: Allow 1MB of slack between the e820 map and SRAT, not 4GB

It is expected that there might be slight differences between the e820
map and the SRAT table and the intention was that 1MB of slack be allowed.

The calculation comparing e820ram and pxmram assumes the units are bytes,
when they are in fact pages. This means 4GB of slack is being allowed,
not 1MB. This patch makes the correct comparison.

comment is from Mel.

[ Impact: don't accept buggy SRATs that could dump up to 4G of RAM ]

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4A03E13E.6050107@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index c7a18aa..87b45bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes)
 	}
 
 	e820ram = max_pfn - (e820_hole_size(0, max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT)>>PAGE_SHIFT);
-	/* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow a bit of slack. */
-	if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= 1*1024*1024) {
+	/* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */
+	if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= (1<<(20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR
 	"SRAT: PXMs only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n",
 			(pxmram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/