[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18951.32643.749495.538351@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:29:39 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf_counter: rework ioctl()s
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> Corey noticed that ioctl()s on grouped counters didn't work on the whole group.
> This extends the ioctl() interface to take a second argument that is
> interpreted as a flags field. We then provide PERF_IOC_FLAG_GROUP to toggle
> the behaviour.
>
> Having this flag gives the greatest flexibility, allowing you to individually
> enable/disable/reset counters in a group, or all together.
As far as enable/disable are concerned, I don't think this is really
necessary. My intention was that if you want to enable/disable a
whole group you just enable/disable the leader and leave all its
siblings enabled, since if the leader is disabled the whole group
can't go on.
Corey's problem was that we have a bug where enabling the leader only
puts the leader on and not the enabled group members. I meant to send
a patch to fix that ages ago but I got distracted. I'll send out the
patch shortly.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists