[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511120514.GA13954@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:05:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robert.richter@....com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter, x86: remove
X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON flag for AMD cpus
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 12:02 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > There is one more way to check performance monitor support for
> > > Intel by using IA32_MISC_ENABLE MSR (0x1A0) bit 7 tells whether
> > > performance monitoring is available or not.
> > >
> > > But IA32_MISC_ENABLE MSR (0x1A0) is not available for Pentium and
> > > P6.
> > >
> > > So better I will add new cpufeature for performance monitoring for
> > > x86:
> > >
> > > X86_FEATURE_PERFMON : Performance monitor support
> >
> > What is the exact wording of IA32_MISC_ENABLE bit 7 in the Intel
> > documents?
> >
>
> Bit 7: Performance Monitoring Available. (R)
> 1 = Performance monitoring enabled
> 0 = Performance monitoring disabled
i guess, if 'perfmon' is not used yet ('arch_perfmon' is), we could
add this as a separate, new cpu features flag.
Although the confusion factor is high ...
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists