| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090510053840.GG1363@ucw.cz> Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:40 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: trekker.dk@...trum.cz Cc: tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce On Fri 2009-05-08 00:37:39, trekker.dk@...trum.cz wrote: > Well... > > > > > > >To summarise disadvantages: > > > >- only core has 8000 LoC > >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace > > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). > >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. > >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing > > > > To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. > (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) > Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists