[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511124314.GJ13954@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:43:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [FOR REVIEW, PATCH 2/2] introduce "struct wait_opts" to
simplify do_wait() pathes
* Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 06:15:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > (add Andy)
> >
> > On 05/07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 05/06, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > One small nit with the definition above: when using vertical spacing
> > > > > (which really looks nice) we tend to put the asterix to the type
> > > > > itself, not to the variable. I.e.:
> > > > >
> > > > > enum pid_type wtype;
> > > > > struct pid * wpid;
> > > > > int wflags;
>
> My expectation would normally be that this would be written more as:
>
> enum pid_type wtype;
> struct pid *wpid;
> int wflags;
Correct - i was confused there.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists