[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905111614570.3561@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:22:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
len.brown@...el.com, mingo@...e.hu, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: do not mark TSC unstable for invalid C-states
commit a71e4917dc0ebbcb5a0ecb7ca3486643c1c9a6e2 (ACPI: idle:
mark_tsc_unstable() at init-time, not run-time) marks TSC unstable
even on non affected systems.
The reason is that the state enumeration does not check the cx->valid
flag before calling tsc_halts_in_c(), so it marks TSC unstable for any
enumerated albeit invalid C state which is known to turn off TSC.
Check cx->valid before checking whether the TSC might become unstable.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(s
#if defined (CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME) && defined (CONFIG_X86)
/* TSC could halt in idle, so notify users */
- if (tsc_halts_in_c(cx->type))
+ if (cx->valid && tsc_halts_in_c(cx->type))
mark_tsc_unstable("TSC halts in idle");;
#endif
switch (cx->type) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists