[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511073053.4628b28c@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:30:53 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] devtmpfs patches
On Mon, 11 May 2009 16:14:28 +0200
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:10, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> wrote:
> >> And I did, and it's obvious that creating a single file along with
> >> the ~10 we already create in /sys, instead of running through /sys
> >> or /proc later and reconstruct what we missed, is always, and in
> >> every case faster and simpler. It gets rid of a bunch of things we
> >> need to
> >
> > Arjan's numbers for sysfs are 0.06 seconds if I remember the mail
> > correctly. That doesn't account for any meaningful speedup.
>
> Sure it does. It is great, and it started a huge effort for many
> people to think about the current way to do it. It is very welcome and
> it counts a lot, and there is no doubt, that most of the gains we get
> today are due to Arjans work in that area.
>
> But he does not use an initramfs, and distros insist to do that. And
> that basically means you need to prepare /dev two times, and also prep
eh why?
this is the part I'm missing.
Make /dev in the initramfs, then bind-mount-move it to its final
location later.
you ever only need to fill your tmpfs /dev once. initramfs or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists