| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:14:55 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] fiemap tester Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:13:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:16:49 -0400 >> Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com> wrote: >> >>> Here is small little program which I and Eric have been working on this week to >>> better test FIEMAP >> I for one wouldn't complain were someone to create >> Documentation/fs/tests/ and to then start filling it with stuff. > > Why oh why do people think Documentation/ is a good place for code? > > tests/ would be a much better place :) > > Last time I brought the idea of a small in-tree test harness up at KS > people weren't too fond of it, but if we get more backing now we could > try it, otherwise we can just stick it into xfsqa which will hopefully > soon be generalized to a general fs QA suite. FWIW, the xfsprogs test suite git tree is currently at 11M; and that's mostly just for one subtype of one subsystem. Aiming to have a full kernel test suite in the kernel tree sounds lke it could get unwieldy to me... I'll stick this new test into xfstests regardless, for now... -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists