[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0840EF.6020601@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:14:55 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] fiemap tester
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:13:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:16:49 -0400
>> Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is small little program which I and Eric have been working on this week to
>>> better test FIEMAP
>> I for one wouldn't complain were someone to create
>> Documentation/fs/tests/ and to then start filling it with stuff.
>
> Why oh why do people think Documentation/ is a good place for code?
>
> tests/ would be a much better place :)
>
> Last time I brought the idea of a small in-tree test harness up at KS
> people weren't too fond of it, but if we get more backing now we could
> try it, otherwise we can just stick it into xfsqa which will hopefully
> soon be generalized to a general fs QA suite.
FWIW, the xfsprogs test suite git tree is currently at 11M; and that's
mostly just for one subtype of one subsystem. Aiming to have a full
kernel test suite in the kernel tree sounds lke it could get unwieldy to
me...
I'll stick this new test into xfstests regardless, for now...
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists