[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511162955.GE10722@erda.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:29:55 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: Addition of cpufeatures to friendly
access miscellaneous MSRs
On 11.05.09 21:44:54, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Complete log is available at:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-cpu.git;a=shortlog;h=x86/cpufeature
>
> The following changes since commit 3e0c373749d7eb5b354ac0b043f2b2cdf84eefef:
> Yinghai Lu (1):
> x86: clean up and fix setup_clear/force_cpu_cap handling
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-cpu.git x86/cpufeature
>
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput (15):
> x86: Add cpufeature for Processor Name
> x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power Management
> x86: Add cpufeature for Microcode update
> x86: Add cpufeature for Cache MSRs
> x86: Add cpufeature for Hard and Soft Poweron configuration
> x86: Add cpufeature for Scaleable bus speed
> x86: Add cpufeature for Miscellaneous Features
> x86: Add cpufeature for Platform feature
> x86: Add cpufeature for Hardware configuration
> x86: Add cpufeature for System configuration
> x86: Add cpufeature for System management mode (SMM)
> x86: Add cpufeature for MM configuration
> x86: Add cpufeature for Bus configuration
> x86: Add cpufeature for performance frequency APERF/MPERF
> x86: Add cpufeature for ancient performance monitoring
Jaswinder,
this is the last time I will mention this.
Please send a patch set with numbered patches. Your pull requests are
hard to review. Even maintainers send their patches this way for
review though the patches are available also in some git
repositories. Make these patches relative to a common tree (linux-2.6
or tip) or the maintainers tree (in this case also tip). Doing so,
others can apply the patches easily in a local repository. This will
reduce the efforts to review and test your patches and you will
probably get more feedback.
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@....com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists