[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A085464.5030802@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:37:56 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Yes, I misunderstood that they actually emulated it like that.
> However, ia64 has no paravirtualization support today so surely, we
> aren't going to be justifying this via ia64, right?
>
Someone is actively putting a pvops infrastructure into the ia64 port,
along with a Xen port. I think pieces of it got merged this last window.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists