[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511212350.GA3397@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:23:50 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: trekker.dk@...trum.cz
Cc: tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
Hi!
> >> >To summarise disadvantages:
> >> >
> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC
> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
> >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
> >> >
> >>
> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
> >>
> >
> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
>
> Regarding hardware -
>
> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2
> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT
> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT
> (binary driver for video card every time)
Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should
be easy to test with init=/bin/bash.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists