| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:23:50 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: trekker.dk@...trum.cz Cc: tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce Hi! > >> >To summarise disadvantages: > >> > > >> >- only core has 8000 LoC > >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace > >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). > >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. > >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing > >> > > >> > >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. > >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) > >> > > > >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram? > > Regarding hardware - > > 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2 > 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT > 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT > (binary driver for video card every time) Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should be easy to test with init=/bin/bash. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists