linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: Add __GFP_NO_OOM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 May 2009 16:07:04 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	rientjes@...gle.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, pavel@....cz,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: Add __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL flag

On Tue, 12 May 2009 00:44:36 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> Which means this patch:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124165031723627 (it also is my favourite
> one).

ho hum, I could live with that ;)

Would it make sense to turn it into something more general?  Instead of
"tasks_frozen/processes_are_frozen()", present it as
"oom_killer_disabled/oom_killer_is_disabled()"?

That would invite other subsystems to use it, if they want to.  Which
might well be a bad thing on their behalf, hard to say..


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/