linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]X86: make sparse mem work in non-NUMA mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090512075933.GA26689@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2009 09:59:33 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]X86: make sparse mem work in non-NUMA mode


* Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:

> With sparse, memory holes should not be marked present for memmap.
> This patch makes sparse really works on non-NUMA mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>

It does not apply cleanly to the latest x86 tree:

  patching file arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
  Hunk #1 succeeded at 718 (offset -43 lines).
  patching file arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
  Hunk #1 FAILED at 638.
  1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/mm/init_64.c

Could you please send a patch against:

	http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/