[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905121718040.24066@qirst.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:20:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: protect a fraction of file backed mapped
pages from reclaim
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The patch that only allows active file pages to be deactivated
> if the active file LRU is larger than the inactive file LRU should
> protect the working set from being evicted due to streaming IO.
Streaming I/O means access once? What exactly are the criteria for a page
to be part of streaming I/O? AFAICT the definition is more dependent on
the software running than on a certain usage pattern discernible to the
VM. Software may after all perform multiple scans over a stream of data or
go back to prior locations in the file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists