linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class, take 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A09B821.8000604@sonarnerd.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2009 20:55:45 +0300
From:	Jussi Laako <jussi@...arnerd.net>
To:	Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>
CC:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	James Courtier-Dutton <James@...erbug.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class, take 2

Raistlin wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure I can see why, since nor a "SCHED_MM" scheduling
> policy, nor having priorities for SCHED_OTHER (different from nice
> levels) is _not_ POSIX compliant, is it?

By the way, why is SCHED_IDLE and SCHED_BATCH OK, but not SCHED_MM?

Or is it the name? How about SCHED_INTERACTIVE?


	- Jussi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/