[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A09BC90.9030700@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:14:40 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] deal with interrupt shadow state for emulated instruction
Glauber Costa wrote:
> we currently unblock shadow interrupt state when we skip an instruction,
> but failing to do so when we actually emulate one. This blocks interrupts
> in key instruction blocks, in particular sti; hlt; sequences
>
> If the instruction emulated is an sti, we have to block shadow interrupts.
> The same goes for mov ss. pop ss also needs it, but we don't currently
> emulate it.
>
> Without this patch, I cannot boot gpxe option roms at vmx machines.
> This is described at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494469
>
> @@ -1618,6 +1620,15 @@ special_insn:
> int err;
>
> sel = c->src.val;
> + if (c->modrm_reg == VCPU_SREG_SS) {
> + u32 int_shadow =
> + kvm_x86_ops->get_interrupt_shadow(ctxt->vcpu,
> + X86_SHADOW_INT_MOV_SS);
> + /* See sti emulation for an explanation of this */
> + if (!(int_shadow & X86_SHADOW_INT_MOV_SS))
> + ctxt->interruptibility = X86_SHADOW_INT_MOV_SS;
> + }
>
The indentation of the first statement here is annoying. Suggest a
function toggle_interruptibility(ctxt, mask). Would eliminate the need
for the comment forward reference as well.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists