[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905121431020.13338@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] threaded-irqs: fix comment to say IRQ_WAKE_THREAD
Trying to implement a driver to use threaded irqs, I was confused when the
return value to use that was described in the comment above
request_threaded_irq was not defined.
Turns out that the enum is IRQ_WAKE_THREAD where as the comment said
IRQ_THREAD_WAKE.
[Impact: do not confuse developers with wrong comments ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 2734eca..eb47f8b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_irq);
* still called in hard interrupt context and has to check
* whether the interrupt originates from the device. If yes it
* needs to disable the interrupt on the device and return
- * IRQ_THREAD_WAKE which will wake up the handler thread and run
+ * IRQ_WAKE_THREAD which will wake up the handler thread and run
* @thread_fn. This split handler design is necessary to support
* shared interrupts.
*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists