[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905121623560.16057@qirst.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:26:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: protect a fraction of file backed mapped
pages from reclaim
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Rik van Riel wrote:
> How many do you want before you're satisfied that this
> benefits a significant number of workloads?
One would be a good starter.
> How many numbers do you want to feel safe that no workloads
> suffer badly from this patch?
>
> Also, wow would you measure a concept as nebulous as desktop
> interactivity?
Measure the response to desktop clicks? I.e. retrieve an URL with a
webbrowser that was running when the other load started.
> Btw, the patch has gone into the Fedora kernel RPM to get
> a good amount of user testing. I'll let you know what the
> users say (if anything).
I have not seen a single reference to a measurement taken with this patch.
Maybe that is because I have not looked at the threads that discuss
measurements with this patch. Where are they?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists