[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512220807.GA26588@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:08:07 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8250: Don't restore NS16550 mode when console suspend
is disabled
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:00:16PM +0000, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> Commit b5b82df6, from May 2007, breaks no_console_suspend on the OLPC
> XO laptop. Basically what happens is that upon returning from resume,
> serial8250_resume_port() will reconfigure the port for high speed
> mode and all console output will be garbled, making debug of the
> resume path painful. This patch modifies serial8250_resume_port() to
> not touch the port in the case where it is the console port and console
> suspend is disabled.
[cut]
> --- a/drivers/serial/8250.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c
> @@ -2887,7 +2887,8 @@ void serial8250_resume_port(int line)
> {
> struct uart_8250_port *up = &serial8250_ports[line];
>
> - if (up->capabilities & UART_NATSEMI) {
> + if ((up->capabilities & UART_NATSEMI) &&
> + (!uart_console(&up->port) && console_suspend_enabled)) {
Shouldn't this be || instead of && - as in: if it is NOT a console port
OR console suspend is enabled?
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists