[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512230514.GB11084@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:05:14 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>, johannes@...solutions.net,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] aoa: remove driver_data direct access of
struct device
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:23:47AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:43 -0700,
> Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:40:05AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Mon, 11 May 2009 21:54:51 +0200,
> > > Roel Kluin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > To avoid direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device, the
> > > > functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> > >
> > > The same fix has been already in Greg's tree (and thus in linux-next).
> > >
> > > Greg, is it OK that I take over your patch to sound git tree?
> >
> > Yes, please do, no objection from me at all.
>
> OK, will do.
>
> BTW, should it be pushed to 2.6.30? If "the near future" you
> mentioned in the patch means 2.6.31, it'll be better to merge that fix
> now. Otherwise, I'm going to apply the patch as a 2.6.31 material.
.31 is fine, that is what I was meaning by with "near future" :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists