From: Steven Rostedt The ring_buffer_time_stamp that is exported adds a little more overhead than is needed for using it internally. This patch adds an internal timestamp function that can be inlined (a single line function) and used internally for the ring buffer. [ Impact: a little less overhead to the ring buffer ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index f452de2..a9e645a 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -454,13 +454,18 @@ struct ring_buffer_iter { /* Up this if you want to test the TIME_EXTENTS and normalization */ #define DEBUG_SHIFT 0 +static inline u64 rb_time_stamp(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu) +{ + /* shift to debug/test normalization and TIME_EXTENTS */ + return buffer->clock() << DEBUG_SHIFT; +} + u64 ring_buffer_time_stamp(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu) { u64 time; preempt_disable_notrace(); - /* shift to debug/test normalization and TIME_EXTENTS */ - time = buffer->clock() << DEBUG_SHIFT; + time = rb_time_stamp(buffer, cpu); preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace(); return time; @@ -1247,7 +1252,7 @@ rb_move_tail(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer->tail_page = next_page; /* reread the time stamp */ - *ts = ring_buffer_time_stamp(buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu); + *ts = rb_time_stamp(buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu); cpu_buffer->tail_page->page->time_stamp = *ts; } @@ -1413,7 +1418,7 @@ rb_reserve_next_event(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, ++nr_loops > 1000)) return NULL; - ts = ring_buffer_time_stamp(cpu_buffer->buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu); + ts = rb_time_stamp(cpu_buffer->buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu); /* * Only the first commit can update the timestamp. -- 1.6.2.4 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/