[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512065316.GD19296@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:53:16 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: Specific support for Intel Atom architecture
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:30:19PM +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/module.h
> > > b/arch/x86/include/asm/module.h index 47d6274..e959c4a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/module.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/module.h
> > > @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct mod_arch_specific {};
> > > #define MODULE_PROC_FAMILY "586MMX "
> > > #elif defined CONFIG_MCORE2
> > > #define MODULE_PROC_FAMILY "CORE2 "
> > > +#elif defined CONFIG_MATOM
> > > +#define MODULE_PROC_FAMILY "ATOM "
> >
> > This should be obsolete anyways, you can just uses CORE2. They have
> > compatible ISAs.
> So you would recommend writing
>
> #elif defined CONFIG_MCORE2 || defined CONFIG_ATOM
> #define MODULE_PROC_FAMILY "CORE2 "
>
> ?
Yes. Or maybe you can find a better name.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists