[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090513054901.GW4140@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:49:01 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swim3: use blk_end_request instead of
blk_update_request
On Wed, May 13 2009, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for pointing this, Boaz!
>
> On 2009/05/13 0:27 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >> blk_update_request() was meant for request-based-multi-path, and not for swim3
> >> please see:
> >> 32fab448 block: add request update interface
> >>
> >> CC: Kiyoshi Ueda<k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
> >>
> >> I think Tejun Heo was just using that in some recent block layer,
> >> transformation.
> >> Tejun?
> >
> > Yeah, conversion was easy that way. I think it's sane to have
> > blk_update_request() exported as long as request internal tinkering is
> > kept in block layer proper.
>
> blk_update_request() is needed for request-based dm to keep the request
> completion ordering in bottom-up, although request-based dm is not
> in upstream yet.
>
> Jens, please keep blk_update_request() exported.
I did, I applied the swim3 patches yesterday as well.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists