linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [resend] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a24804730905130017t545b7645x71ab7a1c8ab4af78@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2009 00:17:29 -0700
From:	Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [resend] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few 
	uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM

> The future model will continue to sample network
> devices on theory that they -might- be less than 100% observable and
> that can only increase our total (unmeasurable) amount of entropy.

That sounds reasonable to me. So should all net drivers now specify
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM?

Or even simpler: could request_irq() assume IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM for any
interrupt that is not (say) IRQF_IRQPOLL or IRQF_PERCPU?

chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/