[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090513080010.GN19296@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:00:10 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> + /*
> + * make sure boot cpu node_number is right, when boot cpu is on the
> + * node that doesn't have mem installed
> + */
> + per_cpu(node_number, boot_cpu_id) = cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id);
> +#endif
Seems like a quite crappy hac^wpatch. Why is it ever set to the wrong
value? And why is that only the case on NUMA and 64bit?
-Andi (who is also doubtful that the rest of the system can handle
memory less memory nodes in all cases)
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists