[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1242204775.24976.7.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:52:55 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH FIXED] x86: use flush_tlb_others to implement
flush_tlb_all
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 20:33 -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> -static void do_flush_tlb_all(void *info)
> +void flush_tlb_all(void)
> {
> - unsigned long cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + /* flush_tlb_others expects preempt to be disabled */
> + get_cpu();
> +
> + flush_tlb_others(cpu_online_mask, NULL, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
>
> __flush_tlb_all();
> if (percpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.state) == TLBSTATE_LAZY)
> - leave_mm(cpu);
> -}
> + leave_mm(smp_processor_id());
get_cpu() returns smp_processor_id() so wouldn't this be more normally
written as:
/* flush_tlb_others expects preempt to be disabled */
unsigned long cpu = get_cpu();
[....]
if ([....] == TLBSTATE_LAZY)
leave_mm(cpu)
put_cpu();
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists