[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1M4ALP-0005za-1i@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:01:43 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: jens.axboe@...cle.com
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, miklos@...redi.hu, max@...mpel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] splice: implement default splice_read method
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, May 12 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 May 2009 15:37:36 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > + for (i = 0; i < spd.nr_pages; i++) {
> > > + kunmap(pages[i]);
> >
> > It is deadlockable if any thread of control holds more than a single
> > kmap at a time.
> >
> > Because there are a finite number of kmaps available, and if one is
> > unavailable, kmap() waits for one to become free. If the number of
> > waiting threads equals the number of available slots, nobody makes any
> > progress.
Ouch.
>
> Good catch, that will not work reliably. I've applied the below.
Thanks.
The bigger problem is that the default_file_splice_write()
implementation in the other patch does the same (it calls
buf->ops->map() on all buffers).
Hmm. Simple solution would be to do a write() for each buffer. But
this only affects HIGHMEM kernels, so it's a bit pointless to do that
on all archs. Sigh...
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists