[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090513100725.GE15360@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:07:25 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix MSI-X with NIU cards
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:21:26PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> 158 static void msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> 159 {
> 160 u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
> 161 unsigned offset = desc->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
> 162 PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL_OFFSET;
> 163 mask_bits &= ~1;
> 164 mask_bits |= flag;
> 165 writel(mask_bits, desc->mask_base + offset);
> 166 desc->masked = mask_bits;
> 167 }
>
> So I don't see how this patch works, all it's doing is moving the readl().
I think you're right. My patch is clearly wrong. I don't understand how
it worked for Dave. Maybe his system is ignoring the errors on write
but can't ignore errors on read? Or maybe his card silently ignores
writes and generates errors on read.
Here's an updated version:
----
The NIU device refuses to allow accesses to MSI-X registers before MSI-X
is enabled. This patch fixes the problem by moving the read of the mask
register to after MSI-X is enabled.
Reported-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Tested-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Reviewed-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 6f2e629..cd66579 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -455,9 +455,6 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq;
entry->msi_attrib.pos = pos;
entry->mask_base = base;
- entry->masked = readl(base + j * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
- PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL_OFFSET);
- msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
}
@@ -493,6 +490,13 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
msix_set_enable(dev, 1);
dev->msix_enabled = 1;
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
+ int vector = entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr;
+ entry->masked = readl(base + vector * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
+ PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL_OFFSET);
+ msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
+ }
+
return 0;
}
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists