[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242211037.24436.552.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:37:17 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDED
submenu
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:12 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > No.
> > As far as I know, many embedded guys use this configuration.
> > they hate unexpected latency by reclaim. !UNEVICTABLE_LRU increase
> > unexpectability largely.
>
> As I said previous(http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/16/209), Many embedded
> environment have a small ram. It doesn't have a big impact in such
> case.
>
> Let CCed embedded matainers.
> I won't have a objection if embedded maintainers ack this.
I probably wouldn't be cheerleading for it if you wanted to make it
optional when it wasn't before -- but I suppose we might as well
preserve the option under CONFIG_EMBEDDED if the alternative is to lose
it completely.
Acked-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists