linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f11576a0905130418w1782f85j12cb938e92d256ff@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2009 20:18:38 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Minchan@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDED 
	submenu

2009/5/13 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>:
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDED submenu
>>
>> Almost people always turn on CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU. this configuration is
>> used only embedded people.
>> Thus, moving it into embedded submenu is better.
>
> Is there are any reason it cannot be just made unconditional unless
> CONFIG_MMU is disabled. It was never clear to me why this was a config
> option at all.

In past days, I proposed this. but Minchan found this config bloat kernel 7kb
and he claim embedded guys should have selectable chance. I agreed it.

Is this enough explanation?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/